Politics is (~)football by other means.

Sports is a fertile field for narrative.  Just look at this weekend; the Brady/Manning matchup in the AFC and the Palmer/Newton NFC match up.  Will it be age before Heisman? 

Speaking of Clause Wits[!] *

* not fully read (or viewed football)yet
of / or 
Clause Wits (3.0)?
\
Neo-Romulan or Anti-Uncle?

[Hume or  ...(~)]
(~)  "the continuation"
"War is the continuation** of politics by other means."
** Relative Exceptionalism

Counter Intelligence

Not really ... or type-O ?

Before I cast aspersions we might be reminded of curve ball and other manipulations for political gain or loss. 

People can be told anything, confirming it or counting on it are another thing, not to mention protecting sources**, let alone foreign and domestic consumption of intelligence. 

5-15-15 Dimentions(~)* of Speculation
QCON, NFRY, NFR, and a number more labels. 
Quick Comment on News
Not Fully Read Yet
Not Fully Read
# more?

*or labels or magnitudes of exposure to "intelligence community"
(~) alternate sarcasm punctuation or (sic) for spelling intended
** not to advocate misleading but international relations, national security and truth as the first casualty of war and Clause~wits are a factor in considering sources.

Priority of Read is another asterisk(or read through the nuance).
Charles Pierce(really) reviews Seymor Hersh's (or) while Huffington(I) reviews the New York Times aspersions and Bergen's(cast)  is unembedded from Charles Pierce's piece.

Ctrl F "anachronistic"

blog search (b.s.) anachronistic*

(search: 4th dunn)
(b.s.) a. Anachronistic Reasoning?, b. Faux Campaign, c. FAUX NEWS!, (e.), f. Clause Wits (3.0)?, (g)host Busters, h. Roar Shack, i. A Tail of Caution, ( j. ), k. ether note, l. F'n P[!]  m. War'n Buffet Rule , n. By Polar , o. From 17A to 37B, p. Killing Fields of Dreams,  q. Future Bubble? , (r.).

*anomaly knot
(_) Rat Races Van Mices?, The LESS THAN pentagonal file:, Bury the lede?, Too Random...,

[ Picture Theory: 1. The Curve or Nuance Thing, 2. For Words!, (3.), 4. GOP Plan to Hurt Economy
Speaking of timing [!] Philosophy Now links may be free for limited time. Democracy is not.
On meaning. / War On/Or Terrorism ? , MoveOn , Decider Stays Course., FAST REVERSE or BACKTRACK BEFORE FAST TRACK , ]

FOOTNOTES PAGE ONE SEPTEMBER 2014

Footnotes Page
in draft*
-

*(b.s.)=blog search
-
Re:labels & other blog spots.

A K A / August missing Footnotes Page
Categorical Empiricists ?**
-

** CAD (To be or not 3d) ?






9-9-14 Original Intent or in tent
(AM IT: [tan gent(~)] Andrea Mitchell ISIS Threat /-/ Witt Gen Stein/Jihadist  Defeating IS IS?
This is not to pun or purge, but to more carefully review later, the word.)


{Stop.} At this point, I will change the heading of this link from #(9-3-14) to "FOOTNOTES PAGE ONE SEPTEMBER 2014"\
-
9-9-14{nexus}
PIT Spot? 1.  T= A. PIT Schtick, B. Clause Wits (3.0)?, C. There is no Savior, :D, E: Three Clauses for ...  [any body love Rice?  Ronan Farrow Daily?]
2. Spoiler Alert? Not yet M-bed ed.
3. C-O.I.? = A.Original Intent?, B. GOP Plan to Hurt Economy, C. The Exit Strategy, D~?.  vOO due: vCR, E. Where everyone needs to read..., F. Table of Contents, G. Health Care Summit, H. Progressive Poll  I. What are the Frackin' Odds..., J.Happy Earth Day!, K.Try Angle,  L. Mess Age Monger,  M. Post-Turkey Day,  N. Nadir, O. Clause Wits, P. Romer Resigns,  Q. Go Purple!,   R. Give an inch..., S. Temporal, T. Back to "The One Thing?". @  {(~)} Future Bubble?


~: OH REALLY FOG / Catch-44
4loreMat[?]: labels 3~ NFRY, meta/slash, P.C.? [/]4Ribble! 
TRP/RBTL: 

Bermuda

Try Angle ? 

Before I tan gent:  It is a clear choice. 
It might B 2 late, butt...  'twain GWB and DC*, pre and post selection. 
Not to jump in the Lakoff, but it about Clause Wits** and spectral orders.

[Translation / D'Ribble?: 'tween Bush and world order, or between what Bush ran on(not being policeman to the world), and what America runs on(speaking of spectral orders), the three branches of government and who the heck they work for.  Do we want a second shot at getting democracy right or just war left?  OW!]

* (sc) later: Bush(43)/vP-resident Cheney
**to parse Clausewitz later(or higher archy)

FP(k)not: A. / B. c. D. E. F. trope? ***

*** not to Footnote but NFRY. (Not to bury Neo-Cons, but to place in the mix, nor Peter, Paul or Merry.

FOOTNOTES PAGE APRIL 2014

FOOTNOTES PAGE ONE
4-9-14 : Trinity of sorts? (s.c.) I will let the reader scroll or click(links 1,2 & 6) & an other trinity.
(b.s.) Not quite bingo or tic tack toe[!] ?  [Or in F'n Try-modal?]

4-10-14  EH?  ...]   >v./, vii. Score Won..., viii. More Money?, ix. Bring It On!, x., xi. The Jig is Up? , xii. THE TRUTH APPARENT: A MOBIUS LAP 

4-17-14 Tzar Chasm or Bird Man: NewsNation/AM in the UCrane.  Diplomacy in the Snowden Error or Obamanomics.  Changing the conversation 'n turning the table & clause wits. 
 

Clause Wits (3.0)?

Politics is...
Economics is...
Hume or is...*

There should be no doubt that this is the most transparent administration...

Not that I enjoin...**
Nor dot dot dot  [!]. ^

*not to jest
^ow = mo ot (or 3rd ot [?])

g? Clause Wits (3.0)?
A. Neo-Romulan or Anti-Uncle?
B. Speculative Physics
C.
D?  Pre-Pan FRY.
E. Clause Wits
f. Battle of Amendments?

Hint: [ ? ] Caution: links R anachronistic of sorts. (c*^)
** 3-26-14 finally read: NOW NFRY, nfry 2.oh?
[RealPerspectivism / On the wall verses on the table.]

Neo-Romulan or Anti-Uncle?

* (FP?)

Bane or Song,
Dutch Treat,
Trans-Parent C?
pair a digm / docs
who
ran A. The Maze of Mace, B. C3-PO?, D.TBA, E. Fair and Balanced..., F. Parallel (Or Not So Pair o' Lax) Channels
off


clock A., B. 11-30-11 , C. Reigning Wags and Tales. D. Refrain Post Frain?, E. Cut the Cow Pie! , F., G. Anachronism , H. I. Leveling the World Stage? , J. Initialism, K. L.


* 1. Spenserian Neo-Platonics?
2. All In?
3. Neo-Romulan
4. A. Speculative Physics, B., C. Pre-Pan FRY. , D. Clause Wits, E. Battle of Amendments?

Z Y X[?] budda bias?

Speculative Physics

Math is next to Godliness? ^
Or sixth sense?

Not just^ another Sunday ! ?

(Not that Socrates is alive[!])

[eff'notes: As of this time there are four lines above. Links inserted line 3, then 4, then 2.  Not to force or farce the model, but there is an event horizon.]

[ seg weigh ? ... is tough to track down ... ? ]

1-27-14  Not that I had any* mocumentary intent. But there was the Pro Bowl with intent to do something different and I had run across a YouTube on a different singularity.  Note that** my "sixth sense" is reference to the six edges of a tetrahedron which has four points.^^  My point of departure or parsing is that we may have a chicken and egg, not to mention crossing the road and sky dilemma.  While the singularities of Chomski and Hawking are different, that does not mean that we dismiss clause wits [!][?] ***

 

* Caging Godzillas 
^ or amer mots? French for "bitter words"
** further tangents?  (math and intelligence)
^^ at this point I will note that I have still to read three:
It's About Blackmail, Not National Security
Get Ready for Rand Paul
Stephen Hawking: Black Holes May Not Have 'Event Horizons' After All
Related ?




*** Our Hierarchy of Needs

[OW ? ! ? ? ]
And the past four ?
Foot notes ?
Not that there is anything in HeyDigger[!] butt ... ? [!] ?

^quote is my creation (recent search and non-related googles).

PC [^]

Pathological[!] Corner*

Kant we all get along without going to Hegel?
Not without Hume or Mill.
Forgot the punch line.**

* (b.s. )
** the third clause will come to me(was it the bottom line?)

[!] =  "..." or (sic){L} (i.e.) ePH'n pun
Related googles: a, b, c

Inspiration: perspectivism on progress
[Un-PC or Ahegelian? Or Perspective Catch.]

11-23-13 The Foundation [!]***

*** routing branches (knot too frack) Hegelian Punditry
{spoiler alert} [^]  R "air quotes" needed?

Battle of Amendments?

Or Balance of Fittest ?

Related Flak [?]

[Reboot Reading List]
[No compunction or qualms with how others connect the dots ?]

This in no way* intends to imply that the amendments have any intention of being in any heirarchy, priority or clause.**

* nor weigh ?   [a Lean Forward, b  Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications. (b), c, d Ghost of X-mas Passed. , e One Heckuva Day. , f, g It's Obama's Turn , h The Fighting Ill Lie Nigh! , i Social Darwinism 2.0[!] , j Now this is the ticket. , k Weird Google of the Day. , l Speaking of Bowls, m X & Y Chromo Somes]
** (s.c.) scroll click[Maslow, clause(b.s.), wits]
[Reading List, RE:VIEWING, Reading List (UC) ]

[Face the Music ! ? ! (cheer/leader/ship/?)]

FOOTNOTES PAGE THREE ARPIL 2013

4-1-13 C-shells! T-shalls? Oar tangent shall = blog(sc) search. 

4-2-13 Re: cull pas knaught? [?]   (b.s.)Swift: The Irony of the Message (sc),Fiddle Sticks^ , c, Recent Letters., Red Labeling!, Swift Reading! (sc), g, H, I, J, K, l, M, Moos Room, O, P, Q, R, A PEAS meant... , T(sc).  /  (b.s.) anacronism: Fiddle Sticks^, b, Primary Boogeyman, D(sc), E(sc),

4-3-13 to too two dimen(t)sionalism [!] ?

4-4-13  to boldly borg by G ?

4-16-13 follow up: not to link meaning nor emphasize leadership, history, dedication, debtedness. (but Ctrl F)

4-22-13 : Speaking of 4 mats ! (GW)
Or the Q T? "math later"
Q = arithmetic, geometry, music, and astronomy
T= grammar, logic, and rhetoric
Alternate Q = No Borg [!]

4-23-13 Ctrl F ? Faith, Filter and Fervor ? Frack 'n Fudge ?[!]?
4-24-13 third line : "pun on"  P.C. (b.s.)Rhythm /  Con Fluence..., Iron Knee of Inflation  (see fore)
4-25-13 Capitalizing on fonts(1) or elements(2) of #$ines (3). (R/R) (1) Clause Wits (sc), Give us a brake?, WTF?, (g), Charlotte 2012! , Why OWS is bigger than Left vs. Right.(sc), GPS , K, L, M, N?   (2) The %th EleFont  (3) (A) Post "don't ask, don't tell"^ ?  Bby Stiob?!?   (4) (a)Punderous Ponderings, B, C(c), (D)Un-Exceptionalism,(e)  
4-30-13 My intent was 'twain footnote and liveblog. Note the list of labels and missing reference to Checks and Balances to bring it to six.  Ctrl F [!]

Pre-Pan FRY.

i.e. NOT Fully Read Yet.
Pan= God of asterisks.***
BushNix unite[!]

That was lede or ship, or a spoiler alert of a headline. 
But I am going to stick my neck out or guess the point of what George Lakoff* may be meaning by Why It's Hard to Replace the 'Fiscal Cliff' Metaphor.

But first I will be facitious** or tongue in cheek, which with the opposition such as it Roves and the Techs- Ass Governor as a frame of reference it may be closer to the reality.

A. They are elephants.
B. It is trickle down.
C. It is politics.
D. All of the above.

* apologies he has not had a Label
** I am at a striking disadvantage having read a book of his
[Now for the read.]
*** Ctrl F (kitchen)

[Now I will comment: Clause^ Wits and Meta4Wars[!]
(fn)

^  post (fn)
[Buy George, that war on X-mass.]

[Thanks to Norman Goldman and a caller
 for additional inspiration for a new metaFor,
the Fiscal Crypt.(see bubble analogy and 4moolah[!])]

Good Night Joe!

Obamacare Tax Penalty,

Morning Joe.

Good Night Joe!

57% want to keep some form of Obamacare!

And when* the Supreme Court sorts out the tax implications and commerce clause, it will be lights out for opposition to the Affordable Care Act. Not that changes might not be down the road.

*NOW** with Alex Wagner (rumors of demise are similarly exaggerated?)

** too late (well 3-30-12)***

*** NOW with Alex Wagner

P.C.

In parsing convention or preemptive comment I will make the preemptive clause that it is better than preemptive conflict. Having said that, if it can be parsed civilly, I will pause constructively. Or rather, post concretely that I have yet to read these two that I feel may be in the balance of political craftiness.*

*Not only NFRY(not fully read yet) but link is only summary, I have a news stand copy to personally congest[!]

[!] a lazy pun on digest and play on PC or P. C.

(and or political con fusion NOT [!]**)

**

[more preemptive comment on parallel content]